Wound encore et toujours

Evidement c'est en anglais mais c'est la FAQ du site : http://www.lead-adventure.de/index.php?topic=26425.0

...Lets assume that that was the Maniacs second Action, now it is the Characters Turn but before nominations a round of close combat is fought to clear up any remaining close combats. Both players roll the dice 'to hit' (see Attacks characteristic on profile: both have 3) Character rolls a 5, 3 and 6. The 6 is rolled again and another 6 is rolled: a Critical Hit! (adds +2 damage on top of the actual damage...) and the Maniac rolls a 2, 4 and a 1. The 1 goes to the Character (Critical Miss). So, Character wins! (Rolled 6 + 1C.C.B. +the Maniacs 1=8.) The Maniac looses with a 6 (rolled 4+ 2C.C.B. =6) The Character wins by 2. Two dice are rolled 'to wound', a 4 and a 5. The damage is added as well as the bonus for being a critical but only the highest dice is used ( 5+1Dam.+2 Crit=8 ) The Constitution of the Maniac is 6 so in the end he is beaten by 1. 6 ties Constitution and so removes the first Wound, 7 removes the second Wound and 8 is one point extra. Now that both Wounds have been removed 2 dice are rolled for Injury and the 1 is added to the total. A 5 and a 6 are rolled. Added together (11) and the 1 added (11+1=12) The Maniac is dead! Hooray good guys win!!!
...

Donc Christian a raison mais j'ai raison d'avoir tord : Cet exemple n'est pas du tout déductible des règles...

Bon je laisse aux philosophes de second niveau l'explication de l'intérets des Wounds multiples.

Tu peux traduire ?

entre la régle et l'exemple il y as deux façon de faire .
Christian utilise l'application de l'exemple qui me semble également la plus adaptée pour ce jeu .
Hazard soulignant une coquille de taille dans les régles .

Bonjour à tous ,
la réponse des kadors du jeu , avec 2 exemples
http://www.lead-adventure.de/index.php?topic=12288.0
ça a l'air d'être clair...
question check ou pas?
hop du coup je retourne continuer d'aller dormir...